4.5 Article

Acoustic Topological Circuitry in Square and Rectangular Phononic Crystals

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW APPLIED
卷 15, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.15.054056

关键词

-

资金

  1. EIPHI Graduate School [ANR-17-EURE-0002]
  2. French Investissements d'Avenir program, project ISITEBFC [ANR-15-IDEX-03]
  3. United Kingdom EPSRC [EP/L024926/1, EP/T002654/1, EP/L016230/1]
  4. EPSRC [EP/T002654/1, EP/L024926/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates the experimental realization of complex topological phononic circuits using square and rectangular phononic crystals, showcasing exotic topological transport. The underlying structure must belong to square or rectangular lattice systems rather than hexagonal-based structures. Numerical simulations and experiments illustrate highly resolved edge states, paving the way for incorporation into acoustical devices.
We use square and rectangular phononic crystals to create experimental realizations of complex topological phononic circuits. The exotic topological transport observed is wholly reliant upon the underlying structure that must belong to either a square or rectangular lattice system and not to any hexagonal-based structure. The phononic system we use consists of a periodic array of square steel bars that partitions acoustic waves in water over a broadband range of frequencies (about 0.5 MHz). An ultrasonic transducer launches an acoustic pulse that propagates along a domain wall, before encountering a nodal point, from which the acoustic signal partitions towards three exit ports. Numerical simulations are performed to clearly illustrate the highly resolved edge states as well as corroborate our experimental findings. To achieve complete control over the flow of energy, we need to create power division and redirection devices. The tunability afforded by our designs, in conjunction with the topological robustness of the modes, will lead to incorporation into acoustical devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据