4.5 Article

Reference-Frame-Independent Design of Phase-Matching Quantum Key Distribution

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW APPLIED
卷 16, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.16.034017

关键词

-

资金

  1. UK EPSRC Quantum Communications Hub [EP/T001011/1]
  2. Cambridge Trust
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11875173, 1217040781]
  4. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019QY0702, 2017YFA0303903]
  5. EPSRC [EP/T001011/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study proposes a reference-frame-independent design of phase-matching quantum key distribution by introducing a high-dimensional key encoding space to overcome the impact of misalignment between remote reference frames on key generation.
The recently proposed phase-matching quantum key distribution offers means to overcome the linear key rate-transmittance bound. Since the key information is encoded onto the phases of coherent states, the misalignment between the two remote reference frames would yield errors and significantly degrade the key generation rate from the ideal case. In this work, we propose a reference-frame-independent design of phase-matching quantum key distribution by introducing a high-dimensional key encoding space. With encoded phases spanning the unit circle, the error statistics at arbitrary fixed-phase-reference difference can be recovered and treated separately, from which the misalignment angle can be identified. By naturally extending the binary encoding symmetry and complementarity to high dimensions, we present a security proof of this high-dimensional phase-matching quantum key distribution and demonstrate with simulation that a 17-dimensional protocol is completely immune to any degree of fixed misalignment and robust to slow phase fluctuations. We expect the high-dimensional protocol to be a practical reference-frame independent design for general phase-encoding schemes where high-dimensional encoding is relatively easy to implement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据