4.6 Article

Genome-wide association study uncovers new genetic loci and candidate genes underlying seed chilling-germination in maize

期刊

PEERJ
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PEERJ INC
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11707

关键词

Maize; Chilling stress; Seed germination; Genome-wide association study; Candidate genes

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31871637, 32072073]
  2. Sichuan Science, and Technology Program [2021JDTD0004, 2021YJ0476, 2019YJ0511]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By investigating 300 inbred lines of maize, this study identified several important gene loci and candidate genes associated with seed germination under chilling stress. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the genetic and molecular mechanisms underlying chilling germination in maize.
As one of the major crops, maize (Zea mays L.) is mainly distributed in tropical and temperate regions. However, with the changes of the environments, chilling stress has become a significantly abiotic stress affecting seed germination and thus the reproductive and biomass accumulation of maize. Herein, we investigated five seed germination-related phenotypes among 300 inbred lines under low-temperature condition (10 degrees C). By combining 43,943 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), a total of 15 significant (P < 2.03 x 10(-6)) SNPs were identified to correlate with seed germination under cold stress based on the FarmCPU model in GWAS, among which three loci were repeatedly associated with multiple traits. Ten gene models were closely linked to these three variations, among which Zm00001d010454, Zm00001d010458, Zm00001d010459, and Zm00001d050021 were further verified by candidate gene association study and expression pattern analysis. Importantly, these candidate genes were previously reported to involve plant tolerance to chilling stress and other abiotic stress. Our findings contribute to the understanding of the genetic and molecular mechanisms underlying chilling germination in maize.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据