4.6 Article

No adverse effect of a maternal high carbohydrate diet on their offspring, in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)

期刊

PEERJ
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PEERJ INC
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12102

关键词

Aquaculture; Nutritional Programming; Salmonid; Plant-derived carbohydrates

资金

  1. French National Research Agency [ANR-18-CE20-0012-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that reducing protein content by 30% and replacing it with carbohydrates in the diet of rainbow trout broodstock during gametogenesis did not have adverse effects on offspring. This suggests the feasibility of increasing the proportion of plant-derived carbohydrates in female broodstock diets to replace fishmeal proteins.
In order to develop a sustainable salmonid aquaculture, it is essential to continue to reduce the use of the protein-rich fishmeal. One promising solution to do so is the use of plant-derived carbohydrates in diet destined to broodstock. However, in mammals, the reduction of protein content (replaced by carbohydrates) in parental diet is known to have strong adverse effects on offspring phenotypes and metabolism. For the first time, the effect of a paternal and a maternal high carbohydrate-low protein diet was assessed on progeny at long term in the rainbow trout. A 30% protein diminution in both males and females broodstock diet during 10 month and 5 months, respectively, did not trigger adverse consequences on their offspring. At the molecular level, offspring transcriptomes were not significantly altered, emphasizing no effect on metabolism. Tenuous differences in the biochemical composition of the liver and the viscera were observed. The recorded effects remained in the normal range of value and accordingly offspring growth were not negatively affected over the long term. Overall, we demonstrated here that a 30% protein diminution during gametogenesis is feasible, confirming the possibility to increase the proportion of plant-derived carbohydrates in female broodstock diets to replace fishmeal proteins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据