4.2 Article

Implications of incidental findings from lung screening for primary care: data from a UK pilot

期刊

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41533-021-00246-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHS England
  2. Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Regional lung cancer screening in England involves lung health checks and low-dose CT scans for high-risk individuals. Only a small proportion of participants are referred to primary care, primarily for suspected chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or QRISK assessment. Changes in patient management resulting from these referrals are infrequent.
Regional lung cancer screening (LCS) is underway in England, involving a lung health check (LHC) and low-dose CT scan for those at high risk of cancer. Incidental findings from LHCs or CTs are usually referred to primary care. We describe the proportion of participants referred from the West London LCS pilot to primary care, the indications for referral, the number of general practitioner (GP) attendances and consequent changes to patient management, and provide an estimated cost-burden analysis for primary care. A small proportion (163/1542, 10.6%) of LHC attendees were referred to primary care, primarily for suspected undiagnosed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (55/163, 33.7%) or for QRISK (R) (63/163, 38.7%) assessment. Ninety one of 159 (57.2%) participants consenting to follow-up attended GP appointments; costs incurred by primary care were estimated at 5.69 pound/LHC participant. Patient management changes occurred in only 36/159 (22.6%) referred participants. LHCs result in a small increase to primary care workload provided a strict referral protocol is adhered to. Changes to patient management arising from incidental findings referrals are infrequent.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据