4.7 Article

Construction of Novel Nanocomposites (Cu-MOF/GOD@HA) for Chemodynamic Therapy

期刊

NANOMATERIALS
卷 11, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano11071843

关键词

Fenton reaction; hydroxyl radicals; GSH depletion; hydrogen peroxide; glucose oxidase

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [21974018, 21727811, 22074011]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [N2005015, N2005027]
  3. Liaoning Revitalization Talents Program [XLYC1907191, XLYC1802016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study developed a novel core-shell nanostructure, Cu-MOF/GOD@HA, to enhance the efficiency of chemodynamic therapy by increasing H2O2 concentration and targeting cancer cells.
The emerging chemodynamic therapy (CDT) has received an extensive attention in recent years. However, the efficiency of CDT is influenced due to the limitation of H2O2 in tumor. In this study, we designed and synthesized a novel core-shell nanostructure, Cu-metal organic framework (Cu-MOF)/glucose oxidase (GOD)@hyaluronic acid (HA) (Cu-MOF/GOD@HA) for the purpose of improving CDT efficacy by increasing H2O2 concentration and cancer cell targeting. In this design, Cu-MOF act as a CDT agent and GOD carrier. Cu(II) in Cu-MOF are reduced to Cu(I) by GSH to obtain Cu(I)-MOF while GSH is depleted. The depletion of GSH reinforces the concentration of H2O2 in tumor to improve the efficiency of CDT. The resultant Cu(I)-MOF catalyze H2O2 to generate hydroxyl radicals (center dot OH) for CDT. GOD can catalyze glucose (Glu) to supply H2O2 for CDT enhancement. HA act as a targeting molecule to improve the targeting ability of Cu-MOF/GOD@HA to the tumor cells. In addition, after loading with GOD and coating with HA, the proportion of Cu(I) in Cu-MOF/GOD@HA is increased compared with the proportion of Cu(I) in Cu-MOF. This phenomenon may shorten the reactive time from Cu-MOF to Cu(I)-MOF. The CDT enhancement as a result of GOD and HA effects in Cu-MOF/GOD@HA was evidenced by in vitro cell and in vivo animal studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据