4.7 Article

Antioxidative Activity of Soy, Wheat and Pea Protein Isolates Characterized by Multi-Enzyme Hydrolysis

期刊

NANOMATERIALS
卷 11, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano11061509

关键词

plant protein isolate; enzyme hydrolysis; characteristics; cell viability; antioxidant

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST
  2. Taiwan) [MOST109-2628-B-038-015-, 109-2314-B-038-059-, 106-2320-B-038-064-MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that soy protein isolate hydrolysate had the best antioxidant activity and particle size advantage among the three plant protein isolates after multi-enzyme hydrolysis, making it a potential dietary supplement for healthy diet and medical applications.
Hydrolysis of protein by proteases produces small molecular weights (MWs) peptides as nanomaterials that are easily absorbed. This study investigated the physicochemical properties and antioxidant activity of three plant protein isolates (PIs) including soy, wheat and pea after multi-enzyme hydrolysis. The MWs, particle size and microstructure of PI hydrolysate (PIH) were determined by SDS-PAGE and MALDI-TOF-MS mass spectrometry, dynamic light scattering and transmission electron microscopy, respectively. Cell viability was determined in vitro using a mouse skeletal muscle cell line (C2C12) and crystal violet staining. The MWs and particle sizes of the three plant PIs were reduced after hydrolysis by three proteases (bromelain, Neutrase and Flavourzyme). The MWs of soy, wheat and pea PIH were 103.5-383.0 Da, 103.5-1146.5 Da and 103.1-1937.7 Da, respectively, and particle size distributions of 1.9-2.0 nm, 3.2-5.6 nm and 1.3-3.2 nm, respectively. All three plant PIHs appeared as aggregated nanoparticles. Soy PIH (100 mu g/mL) provided better protection against H2O2-induced oxidative damage to C2C12 than wheat or pea PIH. In summary, soy PIH had the best antioxidant activity, and particle size than wheat PIH and pea PIH. Therefore, soy PIH might be a dietary supplement for healthy diet and medical applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据