4.7 Article

Co2P2O7 Microplate/Bacterial Cellulose-Derived Carbon Nanofiber Composites with Enhanced Electrochemical Performance

期刊

NANOMATERIALS
卷 11, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano11082015

关键词

Co2P2O7; bacterial cellulose; carbon nanofiber; electrochemical properties; supercapacitor

资金

  1. Industrial Post-Doctorate Development for Agriculture, Food, Energy, Bio-materials for the Future from Khon Kaen University, Thailand
  2. Basic Research Fund of Khon Kaen University
  3. Research and Graduate Studies, Khon Kaen University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanocrystalline Co2P2O7 and carbon nanofiber composites prepared through a specific process exhibit enhanced electrochemical performance, with higher specific surface area and capacitance, improved electrical conductivity and electron transfer, and higher energy and power densities compared to pure Co2P2O7 electrodes.
Nanocrystalline Co2P2O7 and carbon nanofiber (Co2P2O7/CNFs) composites with enhanced electrochemical performance were obtained by calcination after a hydrothermal process with NH4CoPO4 center dot H2O/bacterial cellulose precursors under an argon atmosphere. SEM images showed that the CNFs were highly dispersed on the surfaces of Co2P2O7 microplates. The diagonal size of the Co2P2O7 plates ranged from 5 to 25 mu m with thicknesses on a nanometer scale. Notably, with the optimal calcining temperature, the Co2P2O7/CNFs@600 material has higher specific micropore and mesopore surface areas than other samples, and a maximal specific capacitance of 209.9 F g(-1), at a current density of 0.5 A g(-1). Interestingly, CNF composite electrodes can enhance electrochemical properties, and contribute to better electrical conductivity and electron transfer. EIS measurements showed that the charge-transfer resistance (R-ct) of the CNF composite electrodes decreased with increasing calcination temperature. Furthermore, the Co2P2O7/CNF electrodes exhibited higher energy and power densities than Co2P2O7 electrodes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据