4.7 Article

Mechanical, Electrical, and Biological Properties of Mechanochemically Processed Hydroxyapatite Ceramics

期刊

NANOMATERIALS
卷 11, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano11092216

关键词

hydroxyapatite; dielectric constant; cell proliferation; fracture toughness

资金

  1. Indian Council of Medical Research [5/3/8/30/ITR-F/2018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The sintering temperature affects the densification and properties of hydroxyapatite (HAp) samples, with HAp samples sintered at 1250 degrees Celsius showing better mechanical properties and those sintered at 1300 degrees Celsius exhibiting higher cell proliferation. An dielectric anomaly near 210 degrees Celsius was observed in all samples, indicating a phase transition temperature of the HAp system.
The effect of the sintering temperature on densification and the resultant mechanical, electrical, and biological properties of mechanochemically processed hydroxyapatite (HAp) samples was investigated. HAp samples were sintered at 1200, 1250, and 1300 degrees C for 4 h, respectively. HAp samples sintered at 1250 degrees C showed better mechanical properties, which was attributed to their smaller grain size compared to HAp samples at higher sintering temperatures. The nearly identical value of the dielectric constant (epsilon(r)) and better cell proliferation was exhibited by HAp samples sintered at 1250 and 1300 degrees C, respectively. At similar to 210 degrees C, in all the samples sintered at different temperatures, a dielectric anomaly was obtained, which was attributed to the phase transition temperature of the HAp system. Dielectric properties near the phase transition temperature showed a dielectric relaxation-type of behavior, which was attributed to the re-orientational motion of OH- ions in the HAp system. Higher cell proliferation and viability were exhibited by the HAp1300 samples, whereas comparatively equivalent cell growth and higher mechanical strength were observed in the HAp1250 samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据