4.7 Article

In Situ Formation of Surface-Induced Oxygen Vacancies in Co9S8/CoO/NC as a Bifunctional Electrocatalyst for Improved Oxygen and Hydrogen Evolution Reactions

期刊

NANOMATERIALS
卷 11, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano11092237

关键词

oxygen vacancies; heterojunction; oxygen evolution reaction; hydrogen evolution reaction

资金

  1. Chinese Scholarship Council [2016GXZF80, 2017GXZ019672]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study proposes a facile strategy to synthesize oxygen-defect-rich Co9S8/CoO hetero-nanoparticles with a nitrogen-doped carbon shell, exhibiting excellent bifunctional catalytic activities with low overpotentials in both oxygen evolution reaction (OER) and hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). The outstanding performance is attributed to the unique heterostructure and oxygen defects in the Co9S8/CoO nanoparticles, offering new insights for designing cost-effective, noble-metal-free electrocatalysts.
Creating oxygen vacancies and introducing heterostructures are two widely used strategies in Co-based oxides for their efficient electrocatalytic performance, yet both strategies have rarely been used together to design a bifunctional electrocatalyst for an efficient overall water splitting. Herein, we propose a facile strategy to synthesize oxygen-defect-rich Co9S8/CoO hetero-nanoparticles with a nitrogen-doped carbon shell (ODR-Co9S8/CoO/NC) through the in situ conversion of heterojunction along with surface-induced oxygen vacancies, simply via annealing the precursor Co3S4/Co(OH)(2)/ZIF-67. The as-prepared ODR-Co9S8/CoO/NC shows excellent bifunctional catalytic activities, featuring a low overpotential of 217 mV at 10 mA cm(-2) in the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) and 160 mV at 10 mA cm(-2) in the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). This performance excellency is attributed to unique heterostructure and oxygen defects in Co9S8/CoO nanoparticles, the current work is expected to offer new insights to the design of cost-effective, noble-metal-free electrocatalysts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据