4.5 Article

Weld-Quality Prediction Algorithm Based on Multiple Models Using Process Signals in Resistance Spot Welding

期刊

METALS
卷 11, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/met11091459

关键词

dynamic resistance; electrode displacement; logistic regression model; polynomial regression model; resistance spot welding; welding quality prediction

资金

  1. Korea Institute of Industrial Technology [kitech EH-21-0003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An algorithm was proposed for predicting resistance spot weld quality based on quality acceptance criteria, successfully predicting geometrical and physical properties of spot-welded joints. The study utilized four statistical models to predict tensile shear strength, indentation depth, expulsion occurrence, and failure modes, achieving high prediction accuracies.
An efficient nondestructive testing method of resistance spot weld quality is essential in evaluating the weld quality of all welded joints in the automotive components of a car body production line. This study proposes a quality prediction algorithm for resistance spot welding that can predict the geometrical and physical properties of a spot-welded joint and evaluate weld quality based on quality acceptance criteria. To this end, four statistical models that predict the main geometrical and physical properties of a spot-welded joint, including tensile shear strength, indentation depth, expulsion occurrence, and failure mode, were estimated based on material information, dynamic resistance, and electrode displacement signals. The significance of the estimated models was then verified through an analysis of variance. The prediction accuracies of the models were 94.3%, 93.4%, 97.5%, and 85.0% for the tensile shear strength, indentation depth, expulsion occurrence, and failure modes, respectively. A weld quality evaluation methodology that can predict the properties of a spot-welded joint and evaluate the overall quality requirements based on authorized welding standards was proposed using the four statistical models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据