4.5 Article

Application and Evaluation of Mathematical Models for Prediction of the Electric Energy Demand Using Plant Data of Five Industrial-Size EAFs

期刊

METALS
卷 11, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/met11091348

关键词

electric arc furnace; energy demand; regression; artificial neural network; Gaussian process regression; Kohle formula

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the applicability of three different statistical modeling approaches for predicting the electric energy demand of EAF, using more than 21,000 heats from five industrial-size EAFs. The results show that Gaussian process regression (GPR) offers the best overall accuracy, but the benefit of applying nonlinear models varies between the investigated furnaces. Possible reasons for the inconsistent performance of the methods are discussed.
The electric arc furnace (EAF) represents the most important process route for recycling of steel and the second most productive steelmaking process overall. Considering the large production quantities, the EAF process is subject to continuous optimization, and even small improvements can lead to a significant reduction in resource consumption and operating cost. A common way to investigate the furnace operation is through the application of mathematical models. In this study the applicability of three different statistical modeling approaches for prediction of the electric energy demand is investigated by using more than 21,000 heats from five industrial-size EAFs. In this context, particular consideration is given to the difference between linear and nonlinear regression models. Detailed information on the treatment of the process data is provided and the applied methods for regression are described in short, including information on the choice of hyperparameters. Subsequently, the results of the models are compared. Gaussian process regression (GPR) was found to yield the best overall accuracy; however, the benefit of applying nonlinear models varied between the investigated furnaces. In this regard, possible reasons for the inconsistent performance of the methods are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据