4.4 Article

Absolute Quantitation of Inositol Pyrophosphates by Capillary Electrophoresis Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry

期刊

出版社

JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS
DOI: 10.3791/62847

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [864246]
  2. Brigitte-Schlieben-Lange-Programm
  3. MRC program [MR/T028904/1]
  4. MRC [MR/T028904/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [864246] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inositol pyrophosphates are important intracellular signaling molecules, and a detailed protocol for their quantitation in mammalian cells using CE-ESI-MS has been presented. This method allows sensitive profiling of all relevant species and monitoring of their temporal changes under various conditions.
Inositol pyrophosphates (PP-InsPs) are an important group of intracellular signaling molecules. Derived from inositol phosphates (InsPs), these molecules feature the presence of at least one energetic pyrophosphate moiety on the myo-inositol ring. They exist ubiquitously in eukaryotes and operate as metabolic messengers surveying phosphate homeostasis, insulin sensitivity, and cellular energy charge. Owing to the absence of a chromophore in these metabolites, a very high charge density, and low abundance, their analysis requires radioactive tracer, and thus it is convoluted and expensive. Here, the study presents a detailed protocol to perform absolute and high throughput quantitation of inositol pyrophosphates from mammalian cells by capillary electrophoresis electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (CE-ESI-MS). This method enables the sensitive profiling of all biologically relevant PP-InsPs species in mammalian cells, enabling baseline separation of regioisomers. Absolute cellular concentrations of PP-InsPs, including minor isomers, and monitoring of their temporal changes in HCT116 cells under several experimental conditions are presented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据