4.4 Article

Digital-Droplet PCR to Detect Indels Mutations in Genetically Modified Anopheline Mosquito Populations

期刊

出版社

JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS
DOI: 10.3791/62607

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of California Irvine Malaria Initiative

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent advances in mosquito genomics and genetic engineering technologies have created a need for efficient methods for detecting DNA sequence variations. ddPCR is a high-throughput method for analyzing NHEJ that provides quantitative estimates of sequence variations within populations. It can be implemented in field-site laboratories more easily and has a faster turn-around time for results compared to next-generation or Sanger sequencing, allowing for quicker and more complete analysis of genetic variation in wild populations during field trials of genetically-engineered organisms.
Recent advances in mosquito genomics and genetic engineering technologies have fostered a need for quick and efficient methods for detecting targeted DNA sequence variation on a large scale. Specifically, detecting insertions and deletions (indels) at gene-edited sites generated by CRISPR guide RNA (gRNA)/Cas9-mediated non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) is important for assessing the fidelity of the mutagenesis and the frequency of unintended changes. We describe here a protocol for digital-droplet PCR (ddPCR) that is well-suited for high-throughput NHEJ analysis. While this method does not produce data that identifies individual sequence variation, it provides a quantitative estimate of the sequence variation within a population. Additionally, with appropriate resources, this protocol can be implemented in a field-site laboratory setting more easily than next-generation or Sanger sequencing. ddPCR also has a faster turn-around time for results than either of those methods, which allows a more quick and complete analysis of genetic variation in wild populations during field trials of genetically-engineered organisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据