4.7 Article

Biochar-induced N2O emission reductions after field incorporation in a loam soil

期刊

GEODERMA
卷 267, 期 -, 页码 10-16

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.12.016

关键词

Aged biochar; Denitrification; Soil structure; Acetylene inhibition; Hotspot; Field experiment

资金

  1. Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) [12N3315N]
  2. FWO-project [3G042613]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biochar addition to soils is heralded to reduce N2O emissions, but still, the explanatory mechanisms have not been resolved. Moreover, it is uncertain whether N2O emission reductions would persist after prolonged biochar incorporation in the field. In this study, we incorporated four biochar types in a loam textured cropland field and intact soil cores were sampled to investigate the physical control of biochar on denitrification after 7 months. During a first incubation experiment, we measured N2O emissions from undisturbed and disturbed (i.e. sieved (2 mm) and grounded) soil cores. Both in the disturbed and undisturbed soil cores biochar at water filled pore space (WFPS) of 80% reduced the N2O emissions by 50-90%, refuting the hypothesis that biochar exerts an indirect physical control over soil denitrification several months after incorporation. Secondly, we hypothesized that biochar creates denitrification 'hotspots' in soil, where complete reduction of N2O to N-2 is promoted compared to non-amended soil. In these hotspots biochar particles could act as microlocations with local anaerobic conditions and local higher pH, stimulating in this way complete denitrification. Via the acetylene inhibition method we did not observe a reduction in the N2O/(N2O + N-2) ratio, which could suggest that biochar did not promote the reduction of N2O to N-2. Manipulations likely to promote labile C bioavailability, here either by glucose addition or by soil particulate OM disclosure after disruption of soil aggregates, resulted in the most prominent biochar-induced N2O emission reductions. (c) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据