4.7 Article

Supercritical extraction and antioxidant activity of major ingredients in Puerariae lobatae root, Pinus massoniana needle, Citrus reticulata peel and their mixture

期刊

JOURNAL OF CO2 UTILIZATION
卷 48, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcou.2021.101518

关键词

Edible herbs; Puerariae lobatae; Pinus massoniana; Citrus reticulate; Supercritical fluid extraction; Antioxidant activity

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [32071509, 31670631]
  2. Department of Science and Technology of Ningbo [2019C10094, 2019C10008, 202002N3083, 202002N3028]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, edible herbs including Puerariae lobatae root, Pinus massoniana needle, and Citrus reticulata peel were extracted using supercritical CO2 fluid instead of ethanol solution. Optimal extraction conditions were determined through experiments and data analysis, assessing antioxidant activity and quality of the natural products. The results showed that certain components exhibited high antioxidant activity, providing important guidance for extraction and evaluation of herbal natural products.
The edible herbs Puerariae lobatae root, Pinus massoniana needle, Citrus reticulata peel and their mixture SGLUAP were extracted by supercritical CO2 fluid replacing usual ethanol solution. Optimal conditions of the extraction were determined by conducting series of experiments with Box-Benhnken Design of three-variables and three-levels, data fitting and modeling, and analyzing the visual 3D response surface plots. Scavenging free radical rate (DPPH%) and inhibiting xanthine oxidase rate (XO%) of 14 major ingredients in herbs and total phenolic compounds in SGLUAP were assessed. Among them, gallic acid gave DPPH (%) of 94.5 % to be higher than the reference Vitamin C, and daidzein possessed XO (%) of 97.8 % to be much higher than the reference allopurinol. This work has demonstrated a reliable and efficient methodology for extraction optimization, antioxidant activity evaluation and quality assessment of natural products from herbs or plants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据