4.7 Article

A phosphorus sorption index and its use to estimate leaching of dissolved phosphorus from agricultural soils in Ontario

期刊

GEODERMA
卷 274, 期 -, 页码 79-87

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.04.002

关键词

Soil test phosphorus; Phosphorus sorption; Phosphorus loss; Langmuir equation; Degree of phosphorus saturation

资金

  1. Nutrient Management Joint Research Program of the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Rural Affairs (OMAFRA)
  2. Ministry of the Environment [NM8002]
  3. OMAFRA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Compared with soil testing phosphorus (STP), such as Olsen P, the degree of P saturation (DPS) generally improves the risk prediction for soil P loss. This study was conducted to assess various P sorption indices (PSI) to indicate P sorption maximum (Q(max)) of soils, and their derived DPS indices as indicators of dissolved reactive P (DRP) concentration in soil leachate. A total of 236 intact soil columns were collected for leaching experiments from six major soil series in Ontario. By conducting the single-point isotherm, PSI-a of a given soil was determined as the amount of P sorbed by the soil during 24-h shaking in the 60 mg P L-1 solution, PSI-b as the quotient of PSI-a/log C, where C is the solution P concentration after 24-h shaking, and PSI-c as the sum of PSI-a and Olsen P concentration. Among the tested PSIs, PSI-c gave the best prediction of Q(max). Compared to Olsen P, soil DPS-1 (i.e. the quotient of Olsen P/PSI-c) improved the prediction of leachate DRP concentration. Moreover, soil pH did not impact the relationship of DPS-1 vs. soluble soil P loss. Based on the results from conditional probability analyses, Ontario soils were grouped into no risk, low risk, medium risk, and high risk categories. Considering that Olsen P is the current agronomic STP in Ontario and PSI-c can be quickly determined, soil DPS-1 can be used to identify leaching P loss and/or combined with site hydrology and P management practices for a more comprehensive soil P loss assessment. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据