4.6 Article

Arabidopsis Hypocotyl Adventitious Root Formation Is Suppressed by ABA Signaling

期刊

GENES
卷 12, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/genes12081141

关键词

adventitious roots; abscisic acid; Arabidopsis thaliana

资金

  1. Research Foundation Flanders (FWO Vlaanderen)
  2. Agency for Innovation by Science and Technology in Flanders (VLAIO)
  3. Ghent University (BOF)
  4. China Scholarship Council (CSC) [201806300036]
  5. FWO Vlaanderen (FWO) [1S48517N, G094619N]
  6. MICINN [BIO2017-82503-R]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that exogenously applied ABA can suppress the formation of adventitious roots in Arabidopsis, while the synthetic ABA analog PB exhibits a stronger inhibitory effect. Additionally, analysis of various pyrabactin analogs suggests that adventitious root formation and lateral root branching are regulated differently by ABA signaling, with PYL1 and PYL2 identified as candidate ABA receptors that control AR inhibition.
Roots are composed of different root types and, in the dicotyledonous Arabidopsis, typically consist of a primary root that branches into lateral roots. Adventitious roots emerge from non-root tissue and are formed upon wounding or other types of abiotic stress. Here, we investigated adventitious root (AR) formation in Arabidopsis hypocotyls under conditions of altered abscisic acid (ABA) signaling. Exogenously applied ABA suppressed AR formation at 0.25 mu M or higher doses. AR formation was less sensitive to the synthetic ABA analog pyrabactin (PB). However, PB was a more potent inhibitor at concentrations above 1 mu M, suggesting that it was more selective in triggering a root inhibition response. Analysis of a series of phosphonamide and phosphonate pyrabactin analogs suggested that adventitious root formation and lateral root branching are differentially regulated by ABA signaling. ABA biosynthesis and signaling mutants affirmed a general inhibitory role of ABA and point to PYL1 and PYL2 as candidate ABA receptors that regulate AR inhibition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据