4.6 Article

Descending Dysploidy and Bidirectional Changes in Genome Size Accompanied Crepis (Asteraceae) Evolution

期刊

GENES
卷 12, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/genes12091436

关键词

chromosome number; karyotype formula; flow cytometry; genome size; phylogenetic analysis

资金

  1. National Science Centre, Poland [2017/27/B/NZ8/01478]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study on the evolution of karyotype and genome size in Crepis species revealed the presence of different base chromosome numbers and recurrent origins in different lineages. The increase in karyotype asymmetry accompanied karyotype evolution. The significant variation in genome sizes suggests that, besides changes in chromosome numbers, the amplification/elimination of repetitive DNAs may have played a role in genome and taxa differentiation within the genus.
The evolution of the karyotype and genome size was examined in species of Crepis sensu lato. The phylogenetic relationships, inferred from the plastid and nrITS DNA sequences, were used as a framework to infer the patterns of karyotype evolution. Five different base chromosome numbers (x = 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11) were observed. A phylogenetic analysis of the evolution of the chromosome numbers allowed the inference of x = 6 as the ancestral state and the descending dysploidy as the major direction of the chromosome base number evolution. The derived base chromosome numbers (x = 5, 4, and 3) were found to have originated independently and recurrently in the different lineages of the genus. A few independent events of increases in karyotype asymmetry were inferred to have accompanied the karyotype evolution in Crepis. The genome sizes of 33 Crepis species differed seven-fold and the ancestral genome size was reconstructed to be 1C = 3.44 pg. Both decreases and increases in the genome size were inferred to have occurred within and between the lineages. The data suggest that, in addition to dysploidy, the amplification/elimination of various repetitive DNAs was likely involved in the genome and taxa differentiation in the genus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据