4.3 Article

Representation in measurement

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13194-021-00365-6

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL)
  2. Arts and Humanities Research Council
  3. British Society for the Philosophy of Science
  4. Cambridge Commonwealth
  5. European and International Trust
  6. Newnham College

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces "Representation Minimalism" as a solution to the issues with the Representational Theory of Measurement (RTM), acknowledging its foundational role while addressing its main shortcomings.
The Representational Theory of Measurement (RTM) is the best known account of the kind of representation measurement requires. However, RTM has been challenged from various angles, with critics claiming e.g. that RTM fails to account for actual measurement practice and that it is ambiguous about the nature of measurable attributes. In this paper I use the critical literature on RTM to formulate Representation Minimalism - a characterization of what measurement-relevant representation requires at the minimum. I argue that Representation Minimalism avoids the main problems with RTM while acknowledging its usefulness as the formal foundation of representation in measurement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据