4.5 Review

Stability Issues of Perovskite Solar Cells: A Critical Review

期刊

ENERGY TECHNOLOGY
卷 9, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ente.202100560

关键词

absorbers; buffer layers; degradation; efficiencies; perovskites; stabilities

资金

  1. Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The efficiency of perovskite solar cells has surged in the past decade, but stability remains a key challenge to their commercialization due to vulnerability to environmental factors and device structure. Various groups are actively addressing stability issues and discussing different engineering techniques, as well as the lack of unified criteria for stability tests.
The efficiency of perovskite solar cells (PSCs) has risen rapidly over the past decade, and it has already crossed the 25% mark. However, stability has long been the bottleneck toward the commercialization of these devices. Perovskite is inherently vulnerable to moisture, high temperature, UV light, and other environmental factors, which naturally come in contact during operation. Moreover, degradation of the device is also associated with the hole transport layer (HTL), electron transport layer (ETL), and buffer layers. The mechanisms for PSCs' physical, chemical, structural, and environmental instabilities are discussed critically herein, along with recent efforts made by various groups to overcome these stability issues. Comparison is made among different engineering techniques to stabilize the devices. Moreover, the lack of unified criteria for stability tests of PSCs is discussed. Different degradation mechanisms are collated and compared and recent approaches of different groups on stability analysis from a neutral point of view are critically evaluated. Finally, this review urges future research to focus on novel materials for different layers which are reasonably lattice matched and stable with perovskite layer and use suitable encapsulation techniques for proper sealing of the device against degrading substances.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据