4.6 Article

Borate Anion Dopant Inducing Oxygen Vacancies over Co3O4 Nanocages for Enhanced Oxygen Evolution

期刊

CATALYSTS
卷 11, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/catal11060659

关键词

Co3O4 nanocages; borate anion dopant; oxygen vacancies; oxygen evolution

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [531118010232]
  2. Huxiang High-Level Talent Gathering Project of Hunan Province [2019RS1012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A sacrificial template strategy was used to prepare borate anion doped nanocages catalyst, which exhibited impressive OER performance with controllable morphology and oxygen vacancy defects, beneficial for accelerating electron transport rate and catalytic activity.
The rational design of cost effective and highly efficient oxygen evolution reaction (OER) catalysts plays an extremely important role in promoting the commercial applications of electrochemical water splitting. Herein we reported a sacrificial template strategy for the preparation of borate anion doped Co3O4@ZIF-67 nanocages assembled with nanosheets (B-Co3O4@ZIF-67) by hydrothermal boronation of zeolitic imidazolate framework-67 (ZIF-67). During the preparation process, two different kinds of borate anion sources were found to regulate the morphological structures by tuning the etching rate between ZIF precursors and the borate anion. Moreover, borate anion doping was also found to induce oxygen vacancy defects, which is beneficial for modulating the electronic structure and accelerating electron transport. Meanwhile, the resultant B-Co3O4@ZIF-67 nanocages possess a large specific surface area, which is beneficial for the mass transfer of the electrolyte and exposing more catalytic active sites. Benefiting from the advantages above, the resultant B-Co3O4@ZIF-67 nanocages exhibit impressive OER performance with a small overpotential of 334 mV, a current density of 10 mA cm(-2), a small Tafel slope of 73.88 mV dec(-1,) as well as long-term durability in an alkaline electrolyte.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据