4.4 Article

Comparison of composting dynamics of bovine manure, equine manure, and new shoots of Ulex europaeus L

期刊

ARCHIVES OF AGRONOMY AND SOIL SCIENCE
卷 68, 期 13, 页码 1826-1840

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/03650340.2021.1935890

关键词

Organic matter source; new raw material; compost; carbon; nitrogen-ratio; toxicity

资金

  1. VIP - UC Temuco

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The composting process of Ulex europaeus L. new shoots showed better results compared to bovine manure and equine manure in terms of physicochemical properties, but it required more time to reach complete compost maturity. Each material had different characteristics in terms of temperature, moisture, pH, as well as organic matter, carbon, nitrogen, carbon/nitrogen ratio, electrical conductivity, and toxicity.
Ulex europaeus L. is a species worldwide distributed, without commercial use, but has desirable chemical properties for composting, such as suitable carbon/nitrogen ratio; however, its composting dynamics have not been characterized in new shoots. Thus, we compare composting dynamics of U. europaeus new shoots (UE), bovine manure (BM), and equine manure (BM) in physicochemical terms. The composting process was carried out in piles of 1 m(3) during 168 d for each individually raw material, and the measurement was performed every 2 d for temperature and 14 d for physicochemical parameters. Also, the electrical conductivity (EC) and toxicity were determined at the end of the composting period. The thermophilic phase was reached only by UE at least two times in the period. Besides, UE had lower moisture and higher pH than EM and BM. A decreasing trend was observed in organic matter, carbon, nitrogen, and carbon/nitrogen ratio, where UE had higher values than EM and BM. The EC was lower in UE, meanwhile, toxicity was slightly higher in UE than EM and BM. These results indicate that the dynamics composting process of UE is better than EM and BM; however, UE requires more time to reach complete compost maturity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据