4.2 Article

Algae to angiosperms: Autofluorescence for rapid visualization of plant anatomy among diverse taxa

期刊

APPLICATIONS IN PLANT SCIENCES
卷 9, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/aps3.11437

关键词

aldehyde; anatomy; autofluorescence; cellular; fixation; methods; microscopy; subcellular; throughput; Viridiplantae

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces a novel method for visualizing plant cellular and subcellular structures by leveraging autofluorescence and aldehyde-induced fluorescence, significantly increasing throughput. Results indicate that formaldehyde fixation provides useful structural data without the need for additional staining or clearing processes.
Premise Fluorescence microscopy is an effective tool for viewing plant internal anatomy. However, using fluorescent antibodies or labels hinders throughput. We present a minimal protocol that takes advantage of inherent autofluorescence and aldehyde-induced fluorescence in plant cellular and subcellular structures to markedly increase throughput in cellular and ultrastructural visualization. Methods and Results Twelve species distributed across the plant phylogeny were each subjected to five fixative treatments: 1% paraformaldehyde and 2% glutaraldehyde, 2% paraformaldehyde, 2% glutaraldehyde, formalin-acid-alcohol (FAA), and 70% ethanol. Samples were prepared by embedding and mechanically sectioning or via whole mount. A confocal laser scanning system was used to collect micrographs. We evaluated and compared fixative influence on sample structural preservation and tissue autofluorescence. Conclusions Formaldehyde fixation of Viridiplantae taxa samples generates useful structural data while requiring no additional histological staining or clearing. In addition, a fluorescence-capable microscope is the only specialized equipment required for image acquisition. The minimal protocol developed in this experiment enables high-throughput sample processing by eliminating the need for multi-day preparations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据