4.0 Article

Estimating the Specialist Surgical Workforce Density in South Africa

期刊

ANNALS OF GLOBAL HEALTH
卷 87, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

UBIQUITY PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.5334/aogh.3480

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The specialist surgical workforce in South Africa has doubled from 2004 to 2019, but still falls short of the minimum density of 20 specialists per 100,000 population. There is a significant disparity in specialist surgical workforce density between provinces, with an increase in the proportion of females and non-white specialists over the past 15 years.
Background: South Africa is an upper middle-income country with inequitable access to healthcare. There is a maldistribution of doctors between the private and public sectors, the latter which serves 86% of the population but has less than half of the human resources. Objective: The objective of this study was to estimate the specialist surgical workforce density in South Africa. Methods: This was a retrospective record-based review of the specialist surgical workforce in South Africa as defined by registration with the Health Professionals Council of South Africa for three cadres: 1) surgeons, and 2) anaesthesiologists, and 3) obstetrician/gynaecologists (OBGYN). Findings: The specialist surgical workforce in South Africa doubled from 2004 (N = 2956) to 2019 (N = 6144). As of December 2019, there were 3096 surgeons (50.4%), 1268 (20.6%) OBGYN, and 1780 (29.0%) anaesthesiologists. The specialist surgical workforce density in 2019 was 10.5 per 100,000 population which ranged from 1.8 in Limpopo and 22.8 per 100,000 in Western Cape province. The proportion of females and those classified other than white increased between 2004-2019. Conclusion: South Africa falls short of the minimum specialist workforce density of 20 per 100,000 to provide adequate essential and emergency surgical care. In order to address the current and future burden of disease treatable by surgical care, South Africa needs a robust surgical healthcare system with adequate human resources, to translate healthcare services into improved health outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据