4.5 Article

Highly Efficient Full-Color Inorganic LEDs on a Single Wafer by Using Multiple Adhesive Bonding

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS INTERFACES
卷 8, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/admi.202100300

关键词

adhesive bonding; full-color inorganic LEDs; monolithic integration

资金

  1. Technology Innovation program - Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE, Korea) [20004946]
  2. Samsung Electronics
  3. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20004946] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Monolithic integration of red, green, and blue inorganic LED thin films on a single substrate using multiple adhesive bonding technique demonstrates structurally stable stacked thin films without the need for mass transfer process. The integrated subpixels can be independently operated with high efficiency and cover a wide range of the color space.
Monolithic integration is a promising way to realize full-color high-resolution displays. However, it is still a challenge to realize a highly efficient full-color light-emitting diode (LED) adopting color conversion layer. In this work, red, green, and blue inorganic LED thin films grown on respective substrates for high-quality epitaxial layers are integrated on a single substrate using a multiple adhesive bonding technique. It is verified that the stacked thin films are structurally stable. After the multiple bonding, respective subpixels are formed by using standard photolithography only without a mass transfer process, showing the possibility of applying them to a high-resolution micro-LED display. Even after the bonding, the device still maintains high efficiency without deteriorating performance. The integrated subpixels are not only independently operated by controlling input power, but the light emission can also cover a wide range of the color space, about 83% compared to Rec.2020 color space.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据