4.4 Article

Analysis of cascading failure induced by load fluctuation and robust station capacity assignment for metros

期刊

TRANSPORTMETRICA A-TRANSPORT SCIENCE
卷 18, 期 3, 页码 1401-1419

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/23249935.2021.1942304

关键词

Metros; cascading failure; capacity assignment; network robustness; load fluctuation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52072068]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFB1600200]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper analyzes the metro cascading failure induced by load fluctuation and presents a robust station capacity assignment method. By studying the actual case of Nanjing metro, it is found that small station tolerance and larger load fluctuation can easily lead to global network failure. The coupling effects of station capacity, station tolerance, and load fluctuation strength on network robustness are investigated to obtain optimal model parameters for robust station capacity assignment.
In this paper, we analyze metro cascading failure induced by load fluctuation and present a robust station capacity assignment method. A cascading failure model is proposed by considering system initial balance state, load matching, and capacity-based load redistribution. Based on random walks, an initial failure model is proposed to simulate different load fluctuations that represent unrealistic passenger flows for failure analysis. We study the actual case of Nanjing metro. The results show that small station tolerance and larger load fluctuation can lead to global network failure easily. The phase transition between network functional state and global failure is abrupt and first order-like, which is sensitive to station tolerance and load fluctuation strength. The coupling effects of station capacity, station tolerance, and load fluctuation strength on the network robustness are investigated and the optimal model parameters for robust station capacity assignment are obtained.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据