4.7 Review

Drug addiction: from bench to bedside

期刊

TRANSLATIONAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41398-021-01542-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. FRS-FNRS (Belgium)
  2. Fondation Simone et Pierre Clerdent
  3. Fondation ULB

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Drug addiction causes millions of deaths per year worldwide, but misconceptions from the general public shadow its management as a chronic disease. Drug consumers are often stigmatized, leading to addiction being viewed as an individual issue rather than a societal one.
Drug addiction is responsible for millions of deaths per year around the world. Still, its management as a chronic disease is shadowed by misconceptions from the general public. Indeed, drug consumers are often labelled as weak, immoral or depraved. Consequently, drug addiction is often perceived as an individual problem and not societal. In technical terms, drug addiction is defined as a chronic, relapsing disease resulting from sustained effects of drugs on the brain. Through a better characterisation of the cerebral circuits involved, and the long-term modifications of the brain induced by addictive drugs administrations, first, we might be able to change the way the general public see the patient who is suffering from drug addiction, and second, we might be able to find new treatments to normalise the altered brain homeostasis. In this review, we synthetise the contribution of fundamental research to the understanding drug addiction and its contribution to potential novel therapeutics. Mostly based on drug-induced modifications of synaptic plasticity and epigenetic mechanisms (and their behavioural correlates) and after demonstration of their reversibility, we tried to highlight promising therapeutics. We also underline the specific temporal dynamics and psychosocial aspects of this complex psychiatric disease adding parameters to be considered in clinical trials and paving the way to test new therapeutic venues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据