4.5 Article

A Technology Acceptance Model-Based Analytics for Online Mobile Games Using Machine Learning Techniques

期刊

SYMMETRY-BASEL
卷 13, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/sym13081545

关键词

mobile games; TAM model; SVM; logistic regression; ridge regression; machine learning

资金

  1. Rector of Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland [09/020/RGJ21/0007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Advances in technology have made tasks easier and the manufacturing industry relies on heavy machinery. The online game industry is a prime example of technological breakthrough, now a major global industry.
In recent years, the enhancement in technology has been envisioning for people to complete tasks in an easier way. Every manufacturing industry requires heavy machinery to accomplish tasks in a symmetric and systematic way, which is much easier with the help of advancement in the technology. The technological advancement directly affects human life as a result. It is found that humans are now fully dependent on it. The online game industry is one example of technology breakthrough. It is now a prominent industry to develop online games at world level. In this paper, our main objective is to analyze major factors which encourage mobile games industry to expand. Analyzing the system and symmetric relations inside can be done into two phases. The first phase is through a TAM Model, which is a very efficient way to solve statistical problems, and the second phase is with machine learning (ML) techniques, such as SVM, logistic regression, etc. Both strategies are popular and efficient in analyzing a system while maintaining the symmetry in a better way. Therefore, according to results from both the TAM model and ML approach, it is clear that perceived usefulness, attitude, and symmetric flow are important factors for game industry. The analytics provide a clear insight that perceived usefulness is an important parameter over behavior intention for the online mobile game industry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据