4.6 Article

Carbon Footprint of Surgical Masks Made in Taranto to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Diffusion: A Preliminary Assessment

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 13, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su13116296

关键词

SARS-COV-2; surgical mask; carbon footprint; Taranto; washing; reuse

资金

  1. University of Study Aldo Moro, fondo ordinario ricerca scientifica [2016/2017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research found that the production and disposal of textile sheets for surgical masks are the main contributors to carbon emissions, followed by packaging and transportation. Reuse strategies combined with laundry operations can help reduce carbon footprint, while minimizing textile area and establishing recycling chains are also effective ways to reduce emissions.
The international outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 infection has put pressure on governments to find immediate solutions to the shortage of surgical masks and other protective equipment. To allow textile manufacturers producing surgical masks to avoid usual restrictions imposed on personal-protective-equipment producers, the Italian government issued a ministerial decree that was followed by technical guidelines provided by several universities. Starting from a hypothetical composition and design, we calculated the carbon footprint of surgical masks manufactured following technical guidelines, with the city of Taranto hosting the production facility. Results show that the production of textile sheets composing the masks and their disposal were the main contributors to emissions, followed by packaging and transportation. A strategy of reuse based on laundry operation was modelled, and the balance between disposal strategy and reuse with the laundry operation (which has environmental issues due to detergents and water use) was in favor of the second option. To reduce the carbon footprint, a minimized textiles area (by smart shaping) and reuse strategies result in the best options. Further reduction may be achieved by building up a recycling chain of disposed masks, activated by municipalities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据