4.6 Article

A Fixed Bed Pervious Concrete Anaerobic Bioreactor for Biological Sulphate Remediation of Acid Mine Drainage Using Simple Organic Matter

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 13, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su13126529

关键词

Acid Mine Drainage (AMD); anaerobic digestion; bioreactor; biological sulphate reduction; bioremediation; biological treatment

资金

  1. University of Johannesburg Library, Doonfontein Campus (DFC), Doonfontein, Johannesburg, South Africa

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces a fixed bed pervious concrete anaerobic bioreactor as a second stage AMD remediation process, investigating its pH self-regulation capabilities, SO4 remediation capabilities, and rate limiting parameters. The experiment found performance limiting conditions and verified that the bioreactor design can reduce operational costs and complexity.
The development of low-operational-cost and low-operational-complexity active sulphate (SO4) reducing bioremediation for Acid Mine Drainage (AMD) is an ongoing pursuit towards sustainable mining. This study introduces a fixed bed pervious concrete anaerobic bioreactor as a second stage AMD remediation process. The study investigated the pH self-regulation capabilities, SO4 remediation capabilities and the rate limiting parameters of the bioreactor using glucose as an organic matter source. The AMD was pre-treated using a permeable reactive barrier. A 21-day trial comprised of an increase in the SO4 loading rate while reducing the organic loading rate was undertaken to identify performance limiting conditions. A daily average SO4 concentration reduction rate of 55.2% was achieved over the initial 13 days of the experiments. The study found that a COD to SO4 ratio and VFA to alkalinity ratio below 5:1 and 0.5:1 respectively were performance limiting. The bioreactor was capable of self-regulating pH within the neutral range of 6.5 and 7.5. The study findings indicate that the bioreactor design can reduce operational costs and operational complexity of active AMD bioremediation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据