4.6 Article

The City as an Experimental Environment: The Identification, Selection, and Activation of Distributed Knowledge in Regional Open Innovation Ecosystems

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 13, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su13126954

关键词

open innovation; quadruple helix; distributed knowledge; innovation systems; urban innovation; smart cities; urban living labs; urban acupuncture

资金

  1. City of Ghent

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the past decade, the scope of open innovation literature has expanded beyond economic contexts to societal value creation. The importance of (local) distributed knowledge as a driver for sustainable innovation and multi-stakeholder collaborations in new product development processes has been emphasized. This study explores contextualized interactions between knowledge actors in ecosystems and stakeholder identification and selection processes in urban living labs.
Over the past decade, open innovation (OI) literature has extended its scope beyond strictly economic contexts to the context of societal value creation. This has given rise to the notion of (local) distributed knowledge as a driver for sustainable innovation and has highlighted the importance of multi-stakeholder collaborations in new product development (NPD) processes to develop new ICT systems for complex urban issues. Several studies have discussed sustainable stakeholder ecosystem architectures for such collaborations. However, little is known about stakeholder identification and selection processes for collaborations in the urban environment. By combining action research with a case study design, this paper studies the nature of contextualized interactions between knowledge actors in the ecosystem and the processes of attraction, identification, selection, and activation of stakeholders in an urban living lab (ULL). These insights converge in the development of a 'stakeholder acupuncture framework', which structures mechanisms and practices within dynamic collaboration ecosystems and defines key boundary conditions for such open-ended ecosystems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据