4.6 Article

A Hybrid Traceability Technology Selection Approach for Sustainable Food Supply Chains

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 13, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su13169385

关键词

cold food chain; traceability technology; technology selection; fuzzy AHP; fuzzy TOPSIS; integer linear programming

资金

  1. Commonwealth Scholarship Commission (CSC), London, UK [BDCS-2018-59]
  2. Cambridge Commonwealth, European and International Trust, Cambridge, UK [10462604]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper presents a hybrid approach combining fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) with integer linear programming to select the optimum traceability technologies for improving sustainable performance in cold food supply chains. This methodology can assist decision-makers in identifying the best combination of technologies for a given food supply chain scenario and reducing food loss at minimum cost.
Traceability technologies have great potential to improve sustainable performance in cold food supply chains by reducing food loss. In existing approaches, traceability technologies are selected either intuitively or through a random approach, that neither considers the trade-off between multiple cost-benefit technology criteria nor systematically translates user requirements for traceability systems into the selection process. This paper presents a hybrid approach combining the fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) with integer linear programming to select the optimum traceability technologies for improving sustainable performance in cold food supply chains. The proposed methodology is applied in four case studies utilising data collected from literature and expert interviews. The proposed approach can assist decision-makers, e.g., food business operators and technology companies, to identify what combination of technologies best suits a given food supply chain scenario and reduces food loss at minimum cost.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据