4.6 Article

Chain Innovation Mechanism of the Manufacturing Industry in the Yangtze River Delta of China Based on Evolutionary Game

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 13, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su13179729

关键词

chain collaboration innovation; evolutionary game; synergistic interests; government support; penalties for breach of contract

资金

  1. Anhui Province Social Science Innovation and Development Research Project [2019CX062]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the strategic choices of government, upstream enterprises, and downstream enterprises in collaborative innovation, finding that they have varying degrees of influence on each other's willingness to participate. Additionally, it concludes that government policy support and financial assistance have different impacts on upstream and downstream enterprises.
It is of great theoretical and practical significance to achieve high-quality development that promotes the transformation of digestion, absorption, and re-innovation to an independent innovation model, actively participating in the restructuring of the industrial chain, and enhancing the status of the Yangtze River Delta in the global innovation chain. This study constructs a tripartite evolutionary game model of collaborative innovation led by the government, participated by upstream enterprises and downstream enterprises. Moreover, this article analyzes the strategic choices of the tripartite entities in the process of collaborative innovation, and the simulation analyzes the influencing factors of the government, upstream enterprises, and downstream enterprises' collaborative innovation strategy selection. The results indicate that the government, upstream enterprises, and downstream enterprises have different degrees of influence on each other's willingness to participate. In addition, the analysis proves that government policy support and financial support have different impacts on upstream enterprises and downstream enterprises.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据