4.6 Article

Peruvian Electrical Distribution Firms' Efficiency Revisited: A Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 13, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su131810066

关键词

two-stage DEA; fractional regression models; bootstrap truncated regression; electricity distribution; efficiency drivers; reform

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study analyzed for the first time the impact of the structural reform of the Peruvian electricity market in the 1990s on the technical efficiency levels of distribution companies, as well as the influence of some firm specific explanatory variables on efficiency using a second stage Tobit model. The nine alternative models estimated confirmed that the incentives generated by the reform process led to the firms becoming more efficient. Private management and the ratio of low voltage sales to medium voltage sales positively affect efficiency, while investment per customer is negatively correlated to it.
The extent to which the structural reform of the Peruvian electricity market in the 1990s has improved the technical efficiency levels of the distribution companies and whether some firm specific explanatory variables had influenced upon the efficiency was analysed for first time using a second stage Tobit model to study the influence of some firm specific explanatory variables on efficiency. Some authors have argued that the use of Tobit regression is inappropriate in the second stage of DEA and have suggested using other recently developed options. Due to this, it might be worth revisiting this issue and adding those other alternative models to check whether the conclusions obtained with the Tobit model could be upheld. The nine alternative models estimated allow us to confirm that the incentives generated by the reform process led to the firms becoming more efficient. Moreover, private management and the ratio of low voltage sales to medium voltage sales for each company positively affect efficiency, whereas investment per customer is negatively correlated to it.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据