4.1 Article

High-resolution crystal structure of the Borreliella burgdorferi PlzA protein in complex with c-di-GMP: new insights into the interaction of c-d GMP with the novel xPilZ domain

期刊

PATHOGENS AND DISEASE
卷 79, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/femspd/ftab030

关键词

borrelia; borreliella; c-di-GMP; PilZ; xPilZ; PlzA

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [W-31-109-ENG-38]
  2. NIH Shared Instrumentation Award [S10 RR027139]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents the crystal structure of PIzA in complex with c-di-GMP, revealing its unique two-domain structure and the mechanism of c-di-GMP binding site formation. The information obtained will facilitate further research on the regulatory mechanisms of PlzA in ticks and mammals.
In the tick-borne pathogens, Borreliella burgdorferi and Borrelia hermsii, c-di-GMP is produced by a single diguanylate cyclase (Rrp1). In these pathogens, the Plz proteins (PIzA, B and C) are the only c-di-GMP receptors identified to date and PIzA is the sole c-di-GMP receptor found in all Borreliella isolates. Bioinformatic analyses suggest that PlzA has a unique PilZN3-PilZ architecture with the relatively uncommon xPilZ domain. Here, we present the crystal structure of PIzA in complex with c-di-GMP (1.6 A resolution). This is the first structure of a xPilz domain in complex with c-di-GMP to be determined. PIzA has a two-domain structure, where each domain comprises topologically equivalent PilZ domains with minimal sequence identity but remarkable structural similarity. The c-di-GMP binding site is formed by the linker connecting the two domains. While the structure of apo PIzA could not be determined, previous fluorescence resonance energy transfer data suggest that apo and holo forms of the protein are structurally distinct. The information obtained from this study will facilitate ongoing efforts to identify the molecular mechanisms of PlzA-mediated regulation in ticks and mammals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据