4.8 Article

Highly-stable polymer-crosslinked 2D MXene-based flexible biocompatible electronic skins for in vivo biomonitoring

期刊

NANO ENERGY
卷 84, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.105921

关键词

Electronic skins; PVA; MXene; Molecular dynamics calculations; Ultra-stable; Biocompatibility; In vivo study

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [61874111, 61625404, 21571080, 61888102, 21903034]
  2. Science and Technology Development Plan of Jilin Province [20190103135JH]
  3. Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by CAST [2018QNRC001]
  4. Foshan Innovative and Entrepreneurial Research Team Program [2018IT100031]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study successfully designed a highly-stable electronic skin by incorporating PVA to improve the stability of MXene in harsh environments, demonstrating excellent biocompatibility and functionality.
The ability of electronic skins to identify physiological and physical signals accurately is the key to humancomputer interaction. However, it is still a great challenge to improve stability of electronic-skin when maintaining the high-level pressure-response for applications in harsh conditions. Here, a highly-stable electronic skin is designed by synergistically incorporating strong hydrogen-bonds in MXene and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA). Molecular dynamics calculations show that the introduction of PVA can reduce the diffusion coefficient of MXene in acidic and basic solutions, increasing the adsorption (free) energies and providing hybrid film with good chemical stability. Therefore, the film provides stable performance recordings that last for over half a year in harsh environments. The film also shows good biocompatibility and function in an in-vivo study conducted on mice. To enhance functionality of soft robots and personal protective equipment used in harsh environments, it is important that the film has persistent and stable performance, all-weather usability, and good in vivo compatibility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据