4.8 Review

Metal-organic frameworks-derived heteroatom-doped carbon electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction

期刊

NANO ENERGY
卷 86, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106073

关键词

Oxygen reduction reaction; Heteroatom-doped carbon; Non-noble metal; Carbon-based electrocatalyst; Metal-organic framework

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1906222]
  2. Ministry of Education, People's Republic of China [T2017002]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China
  4. [21677080]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of stable, adequate, and cost-effective catalysts for fuel cells is urgent. Heteroatom-doped carbons and metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are promising materials for electrocatalytic oxygen reduction reaction (ORR). Component manipulation, morphological control, and structural engineering play important roles in improving the ORR performance of these materials.
The development of stable, adequate, and cost-effective catalysts to meet current fuel cell requirements is urgent in the face of ever-intensifying energy demands. Heteroatom-doped carbons are promising non-noble metalbased catalysts expected to replace or reduce platinum consumption required for the electrocatalytic oxygen reduction reaction (ORR). Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are rapidly evolving as porous functional materials owing to their high surface area, permanent porosity, and diverse structure, thus rendering their derivatives suitable potential catalysts for electrocatalysis. Herein, we systematically reviewed the latest advances in the design and synthesis of MOF-derived heteroatom-doped carbons, which were further divided into metal-free and metal-containing materials to identify the effects of component manipulation, morphological control, and structural engineering on their ORR performance. Additionally, future challenges and research directions for MOF-derived heteroatom-doped carbon electrocatalysts are proposed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据