4.8 Article

Doping effects of metal cation on sulfide solid electrolyte/lithium metal interface

期刊

NANO ENERGY
卷 84, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.105906

关键词

Ionic conductivity; SEI interface energy; Metallic ion doping; Li dendrites

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21805182]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the effects of doping sulfide solid electrolytes with various elements on the interface between the electrolyte and lithium metal. It found that the doping of MoS2 can promote ion conduction but also accelerate the thickening of the SEI and growth of Li dendrites, providing important insights for the selection of solid electrolyte dopants and interface construction.
Doping modification is usually used to improve the ionic conductivity of sulfide solid electrolytes, but its effects on the interface between the electrolyte/lithium (Li) metal seem not sufficiently studied and understood. In this work, the advantages and disadvantages of sulfide electrolyte doped with MoS2, ZnS, FeS2, SnS2 and SiS2 are systematically studied. The ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) calculations and experiments show that MoS44can preferentially replace the P2S74- in Li7P3S11, thereby broadening Li+ channels and creating Li vacancies to promote ion conduction. However, the doping of MoS2 can lead to the introduction of Mo metal into the solid electrolyte/Li interface layer (SEI), resulting in the reduction of the SEI's interface energy and migration rate of Li atoms at SEI, as well as the accumulation of electrons, thereby accelerating the thickening of the SEI and growth of Li dendrites. The doping results of different sulfides show that the critical current density is positively related to the resistivity of the doping element. The doping of non-metallic silicon will not cause a decrease in the critical current density. This work provides an important reference for the selection of solid electrolyte dopants and the construction of electrolyte/Li interface.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据