4.8 Article

Design of biodegradable wheat-straw based triboelectric nanogenerator as self-powered sensor for wind detection

期刊

NANO ENERGY
卷 86, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106032

关键词

Triboelectric nanogenerators; Wheat straw; Wind energy

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Project from Ministry of Science and Technology, China [2016YFA0202702, 2016YFA0202701]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the use of wheat straw, a biodegradable material, a novel single-electrode mode triboelectric nanogenerator (TENG) was developed to convert mechanical energy into electrical energy, providing power for low-power electronic devices. The device's unique design and high power density make it suitable for applications in agricultural production and self-powered sensors.
With the development of Internet of things and sensor network, exploring distributed energy is important for their sustainable operation. Finding the best devices and suitable materials that can convert random mechanical energy into electric power has become a hot research topic. In this work, wheat straw, a biodegradable material, was utilized to fabricate single-electrode mode triboelectric nanogenerators (TENGs). Herein, the wheat straw TENG (WS-TENG) was applied to convert mechanical energy with low frequency and small amplitude into electrical energy. The maximum output power density of WS-TENG is 404 mW / m2, and more than 60 LEDs can be lit up. Moreover, the WS-TENG can not only charge capacitors but also power hygrometers, electronic watch and some other low-power portable electronic devices. Furthermore, the WS-TENG was designed as windmill and bionic lawn, which can be used as wind velocity sensor for detection of wind speed and wind direction. Because the WS-TENG is degradable, low-cost and portable, this work provides a novel solution for the advanced science technology to be applied in agricultural production and self-powered sensor for energy harvesting and energy application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据