4.6 Article

An Energy Efficient Thermally Regulated Optical Spectroscopy Cell for Lab-on-Chip Devices: Applied to Nitrate Detection

期刊

MICROMACHINES
卷 12, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/mi12080861

关键词

microfluidic; lab on chip; nitrate; absorbance; heaters; colorimetric

资金

  1. Marine Environmental Observation Prediction and Response Network [NCE/22068-2021]
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [CRDPJ 531352]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel method of conserving heat energy in microfluidic systems has been proposed, which reduces heat transfer by surrounding the heated optical cell with air pockets. The insulated design significantly reduces power consumption and performs well in nitrate concentration measurements.
Reagent-based colorimetric analyzers often heat the fluid under analysis for improved reaction kinetics, whilst also aiming to minimize energy use per measurement. Here, a novel method of conserving heat energy on such microfluidic systems is presented. Our design reduces heat transfer to the environment by surrounding the heated optical cell on four sides with integral air pockets, thereby realizing an insulated and suspended bridge structure. Our design was simulated in COMSOL Multiphysics and verified in a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) device. We evaluate the effectiveness of the insulated design by comparing it to a non-insulated cell. For temperatures up to 55 degrees C, the average power consumption was reduced by 49.3% in the simulation and 40.2% in the experiment. The designs were then characterized with the vanadium and Griess reagent assay for nitrate at 35 degrees C. Nitrate concentrations from 0.25 mu M to 50 mu M were tested and yielded the expected linear relationship with a limit of detection of 20 nM. We show a reduction in energy consumption from 195 J to 119 J per 10 min measurement using only 4 mu L of fluid. Efficient heating on-chip will have broad applicability to numerous colorimetric assays.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据