4.7 Article

TransRate: reference-free quality assessment of de novo transcriptome assemblies

期刊

GENOME RESEARCH
卷 26, 期 8, 页码 1134-1144

出版社

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gr.196469.115

关键词

-

资金

  1. Millennium Seed Bank (Royal Botanical Gardens, Kew)
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)
  3. Department for International Development
  4. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
  5. Department of Biotechnology of the Government of India's Ministry of Science and Technology
  6. European Union [637765]
  7. BBSRC [BB/J011754/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/J011754/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

TransRate is a tool for reference-free quality assessment of de novo transcriptome assemblies. Using only the sequenced reads and the assembly as input, we show that multiple common artifacts of de novo transcriptome assembly can be readily detected. These include chimeras, structural errors, incomplete assembly, and base errors. TransRate evaluates these errors to produce a diagnostic quality score for each contig, and these contig scores are integrated to evaluate whole assemblies. Thus, TransRate can be used for de novo assembly filtering and optimization as well as comparison of assemblies generated using different methods from the same input reads. Applying the method to a data set of 155 published de novo transcriptome assemblies, we deconstruct the contribution that assembly method, read length, read quantity, and read quality make to the accuracy of de novo transcriptome assemblies and reveal that variance in the quality of the input data explains 43% of the variance in the quality of published de novo transcriptome assemblies. Because TransRate is reference-free, it is suitable for assessment of assemblies of all types of RNA, including assemblies of long noncoding RNA, rRNA, mRNA, and mixed RNA samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据