4.6 Article

Design of a Hybrid Inertial and Magnetophoretic Microfluidic Device for CTCs Separation from Blood

期刊

MICROMACHINES
卷 12, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/mi12080877

关键词

microfluidics; cell separation; CTCs; inertial; magnetophoretic; nanoparticle

资金

  1. Biotechnology Development Council of the Islamic Republic of Iran [970402]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Isolating circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from blood samples is crucial for cancer diagnosis and treatment, and microfluidics shows great potential in this area. Combining inertial and magnetic methods on a single chip was found to be effective in separating CTCs, with high recovery rates and purity levels.
Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) isolation from a blood sample plays an important role in cancer diagnosis and treatment. Microfluidics offers a great potential for cancer cell separation from the blood. Among the microfluidic-based methods for CTC separation, the inertial method as a passive method and magnetic method as an active method are two efficient well-established methods. Here, we investigated the combination of these two methods to separate CTCs from a blood sample in a single chip. Firstly, numerical simulations were performed to analyze the fluid flow within the proposed channel, and the particle trajectories within the inertial cell separation unit were investigated to determine/predict the particle trajectories within the inertial channel in the presence of fluid dynamic forces. Then, the designed device was fabricated using the soft-lithography technique. Later, the CTCs were conjugated with magnetic nanoparticles and Ep-CAM antibodies to improve the magnetic susceptibility of the cells in the presence of a magnetic field by using neodymium permanent magnets of 0.51 T. A diluted blood sample containing nanoparticle-conjugated CTCs was injected into the device at different flow rates to analyze its performance. It was found that the flow rate of 1000 mu L/min resulted in the highest recovery rate and purity of similar to 95% and similar to 93% for CTCs, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据