4.6 Article

Pool Boiling Performance of Multilayer Micromeshes for Commercial High-Power Cooling

期刊

MICROMACHINES
卷 12, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/mi12080980

关键词

pool boiling; heat transfer enhancement; multilayer micromeshes; bubble nucleation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51735004]
  2. Science and Technology Plan of Guangdong, China [2019B090910001]
  3. S&T Innovation Projects of Zhuhai City [ZH01110405180034PWC]
  4. South China University of Technology [D6211180]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed multilayer copper micromeshes for commercial compact electronic cooling and investigated their boiling heat transfer performance. The MCM-5 showed the highest critical heat flux and heat transfer coefficient due to its abundant micropores serving as nucleate sites and outstanding capillary wicking capability. The micromeshes were also found to perform competitively with other surface structures in high-power cooling applications.
With the rapid development of electronics, thermal management has become one of the most crucial issues. Intense research has focused on surface modifications used to enhance heat transfer. In this study, multilayer copper micromeshes (MCMs) are developed for commercial compact electronic cooling. Boiling heat transfer performance, including critical heat flux (CHF), heat transfer coefficients (HTCs), and the onset of nucleate boiling (ONB), are investigated. The effect of micromesh layers on the boiling performance is studied, and the bubbling characteristics are analyzed. In the study, MCM-5 shows the highest critical heat flux (CHF) of 207.5 W/cm(2) and an HTC of 16.5 W(cm(2)center dot K) because of its abundant micropores serving as nucleate sites, and outstanding capillary wicking capability. In addition, MCMs are compared with other surface structures in the literature and perform with high competitiveness and potential in commercial applications for high-power cooling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据