3.9 Article

Versatile Usage of the Modified Lateral Mass Screw as an Alternative to Cervical Pedicle Screw Fixation

出版社

THIEME MEDICAL PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1728767

关键词

paravertebral foramen screw; modified lateral mass screw; cervical pedicle screw; lateral mass screw; subaxial; cervical; salvage technique

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study analyzed the use of modified lateral mass screws (mLMS) as an alternative to cervical pedicle screws (CPS) and found that mLMS fixation can decrease the risk of screw misplacement compared with CPS fixation alone, leading to adequate stability and fusion.
Objective Posterior subaxial cervical screw fixation is commonly performed using the cervical pedicle screws (CPS) and lateral mass screws (LMS); however, their compatibility is low. Modified lateral mass screws (mLMS, also called paravertebral foramen screw) fixation was introduced as a salvage technique for LMS fixation and has features of both LMS and CPS techniques. In the present study, the use of mLMS as an alternative to CPS was analyzed based on clinical results. Methods Seventy-eight screws (38 CPSs and 40mLMSs) were inserted into 12 patients. The misplacement of the screws was evaluated by computed tomography (CT). The failure of instrumentation and instability were evaluated using plain radiographs. Results The total number of CPS misplacements was 3 (10.5%); however, neurologic complications were not observed. mLMSs were used in the middle segments of the fusion in 10 patients and 2 patients had mLMS fixation for single-level fusion. An additional bridging implant was not required for connecting both CPSs and mLMSs. Instability was not observed during the observation period (4-51 months). Complete fusion was seen in 10 patients. Conclusions The alternative mLMS fixation can decrease the risk of screw misplacement compared with CPS fixation alone and achieves adequate stability leading to fusion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据