4.4 Article

A non-relativistic limit of NS-NS gravity

期刊

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
卷 -, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP06(2021)021

关键词

Bosonic Strings; Classical Theories of Gravity; Supergravity Models

资金

  1. Netherlands Organisation for Science Research (NWO)
  2. FOM/NWO free program Scanning New Horizons

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The discussion focuses on a specific non-relativistic limit of NS-NS gravity that can be achieved at the level of the action and equations of motion without imposing any geometric constraints manually. The cancellation of divergences between terms that arise from the Vielbein in the Einstein-Hilbert term and from the kinetic term of the Kalb-Ramond two-form field is key to this limit. This leads to the emergence of a local target space scale invariance in the limit, resulting in an extra equation in the equations of motion compared to the action limit. The geometric constraints that can be solved by scale-invariant constraints define a Dilatation invariant String Newton-Cartan geometry.
We discuss a particular non-relativistic limit of NS-NS gravity that can be taken at the level of the action and equations of motion, without imposing any geometric constraints by hand. This relies on the fact that terms that diverge in the limit and that come from the Vielbein in the Einstein-Hilbert term and from the kinetic term of the Kalb-Ramond two-form field cancel against each other. This cancelling of divergences is the target space analogue of a similar cancellation that takes place at the level of the string sigma model between the Vielbein in the kinetic term and the Kalb-Ramond field in the Wess-Zumino term. The limit of the equations of motion leads to one equation more than the limit of the action, due to the emergence of a local target space scale invariance in the limit. Some of the equations of motion can be solved by scale invariant geometric constraints. These constraints define a so-called Dilatation invariant String Newton-Cartan geometry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据