4.4 Article

Regge theory in a holographic dual of QCD in the Veneziano limit

期刊

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
卷 -, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP07(2021)065

关键词

Strings and branes phenomenology

资金

  1. Simons Foundation [488637]
  2. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT) [UID-04650-FCUP]
  3. FCT under the IDPASC doctorate programme [PD/BD/114158/2016]
  4. APCTP through the Science and Technology Promotion Fund
  5. Lottery Fund of the Korean Government
  6. Korean Local Government -Gyeongsangbuk-do Province
  7. Korean Local Government -Pohang City
  8. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PD/BD/114158/2016] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, Regge theory in a bottom-up holographic model for QCD in the Veneziano limit is explored with the backreaction of quarks to gluon dynamics included, leading to a successful fit to the meson spectrum. The model is extended to include higher spin fields dual to the Pomeron and meson Regge trajectories, enabling a fit to masses of mesons with spins J = 2, 3, and 4, as well as experimental data of total cross-sections sigma(gamma gamma -> X), sigma(gamma p -> X) and sigma(pp -> X). The obtained chi(2) d.o.f. of 0.74 for 199 experimental points indicates a good agreement for the cross sections.
We initiate the study of Regge theory in a bottom-up holographic model for QCD in the Veneziano limit, where the backreaction of the quarks to the gluon dynamics is included. We determine the parameters of the model by carrying out a precise fit to the meson spectrum in QCD. The spectrum for spin-one and pseudoscalar mesons is well reproduced. We then generalise the model to incluce higher spin fields in the bulk trajectories dual to the Pomeron and meson Regge trajectories at the boundary. With this setting, we fit the masses of the mesons with spins J = 2, 3, and 4, as well as the experimental data of the total cross-sections sigma(gamma gamma -> X), sigma(gamma p -> X) and sigma( pp -> X). For the cross sections we obtain a chi(2) d.o.f. of 0.74 for a total of 199 experimental points.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据