4.6 Article

Enhancing LiNiO2 cathode materials by concentration-gradient yttrium modification for rechargeable lithium-ion batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENERGY CHEMISTRY
卷 63, 期 -, 页码 312-319

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jechem.2021.07.029

关键词

Lithium-ion battery; Concentration gradient; Nickel-rich cathode; Surface coating; Yttrium oxide

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFA0202503]
  2. SINOPEC Project [129015-1]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21835004, 21925503]
  4. 111 Project from the Ministry of Education of China [B12015]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rationally designed LiNiO2 with concentration-gradient yttrium modification shows alleviative side reactions and improved electrochemical performance, forming a protective cathode electrolyte interface, indicating a promising approach to stabilize nickel-rich cathode materials.
Lithium nickel oxide (LiNiO2) cathode materials are featured with high capacity and low cost for rechargeable lithium-ion batteries but suffer from severe interface and structure instability. Here we report that rationally designed LiNiO2 via concentration-gradient yttrium modification exhibits alleviative side reactions and improved electrochemical performance. The LiNiO2 cathode with LiYO2-Y2O3 coating layer delivers a discharge capacity of 225 mAh g(-1) with a high initial Coulombic efficiency of 93.4%. These improvements can be attributed to the formation of in-situ modified hybrid LiYO2-Y2O3 coating layer, which suppresses phase transformation, electrolyte oxidation and salt dissociation due to the formation of protective cathode electrolyte interface. The results indicate promising application of concentration-gradient yttrium coating as a facile approach to stabilize nickel-rich cathode materials. (C) 2021 Science Press and Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by ELSEVIER B.V. and Science Press. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据