4.7 Article

An Auto-Adjustable and Time-Consistent Model for Determining Coagulant Dosage Based on Operators' Experience

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSMC.2019.2956647

关键词

Predictive models; Aluminum; Water pollution; Machine learning; Water quality; Reservoirs; Artificial intelligence; automation; data processing; water pollution; water resource

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFB1305104]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC 61673118]
  3. Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project [2018SHZDZX01]
  4. ZJLab

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines how to automate the determination of coagulant dosage for water treatment plants. By surveying existing coagulant prediction methods and utilizing an auto-adjustable and time-consistent model, the algorithm introduced in this article shows better accuracy for predicting coagulant dosage. Additionally, taking seasonal effects into account can approximate operator behavior more accurately.
This article examines how to automate the determination of the coagulant dosage for water treatment plants. Whilst most of the processes for water treatment are automated, determining the coagulant dosage, required for reducing turbidity, depends on well-trained and experienced operators. Based on a time-series data set provided by the Shanghai municipal investment water production company, this article comprehensively surveys existing coagulant prediction methods and utilizes an auto-adjustable and time-consistent model to incorporate the operators' experience. Compared to existing methods, the algorithm introduced in this article produced a better accuracy for predicting the coagulant dosage. Moreover, this article demonstrates that taking seasonal effects into account can approximate operator behavior more accurately. To examine the robustness of the identified models, this article examines the model performance based on water drawn from different locations/sources.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据