4.4 Article

Comparative chromosomal localization of 45S and 5S rDNAs and implications for genome evolution in Cucumis

期刊

GENOME
卷 59, 期 7, 页码 449-457

出版社

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/gen-2015-0207

关键词

Cucumis; fluorescence in situ hybridization; ribosomal DNA

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [31471872, 31430075, 31272174]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2012CB113900]
  3. '863' Project [2012AA100102]
  4. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2013BAD01B04-10]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ribosomal DNAs are useful cytogenetic markers for chromosome analysis. Studies investigating site numbers and distributions of rDNAs have provided important information for elucidating genome organization and chromosomal relationships of many species by fluorescence in situ hybridization. But relevant studies are scarce for species of the genus Cucumis, especially in wild species. In the present study, FISH was conducted to investigate the organization of 45S and 5S rDNA among 20 Cucumis accessions, including cultivars and wild accessions. Our results showed that the number of 45S rDNA sites varied from one to five pairs in different accessions, and most of these sites are located at the terminal regions of chromosomes. Interestingly, up to five pairs of 45S rDNA sites were observed in C. sativus var. sativus, the species which has the lowest chromosome number, i.e., 2n = 14. Only one pair of 5S rDNA sites was detected in all accessions, except for C. heptadactylus, C. sp, and C. spp that had two pairs of 5S rDNA sites. The distributions of 5S rDNA sites showed more variation than 45S rDNA sites. The phylogenetic analysis in this study showed that 45S and 5S rDNA have contrasting evolutionary patterns. We find that 5S rDNA has a polyploidization-related tendency towards the terminal location from an interstitial location but maintains a conserved site number, whereas the 45S rDNA showed a trend of increasing site number but a relatively conserved location.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据